Jerusalem court legitimized illegal archaeological activity of Israel

Authorities consider the "disclosing" allows own researches avoid sanctions

Israeli archaeological works in the West Bank and the artifacts found there can be "legally" hide, despite the Oslo Agreement, which obliged to carry out archaeological researches under the jurisdiction of Palestine.

Now, a ruling by Israel’s Jerusalem District Court at the end of November further disenfranchises Palestinians, they say. The ruling authorises Israeli archaeologists to dig in the West Bank anonymously and to lend artefacts found on site to Israeli institutions without disclosing these loans. 

In archaeology publications, Israel has described its West Bank digs as “transparent”. But the Jerusalem District Court rejected most of a petition by human rights and archaeology organisations which argued that Israel is obliged to disclose the full range of its activities in the contested area.

After hearing evidence from lawyers representing Israel’s foreign ministry, the court decided that publicising the names of institutions receiving artefacts on loan and locations of storage facilities could “hurt foreign relations” in future negotiations with Palestinians. Representatives of the human rights and archaeology organisations that brought the petition were not permitted to attend the hearing.

The ruling also found that revealing the identities of archaeologists working in the West Bank could hurt their opportunities to publish, receive research grants and work with research institutions abroad because of international boycotts.

Trying to avoid boycotts does not justify flouting international heritage practices or secrecy that could lead to covert excavations, said the Israeli archaeologist Yonathan Mizrachi of Emek Shaveh, one of the non-governmental organisations that brought the case to court. Accepted practices include publishing all activities and making sure that excavations benefit the local population—in this case, Palestinians, Mizrachi added. 

Read this article in russian.

Source: theartnewspaper.com

مشاركة هذا المنشور:
الأخبار الرئيسية
آراء ومقالات
لماذا يقترب بوتين من حدود الناتو دون إعلان الحرب؟.. تحليل مالكينا
خبيرة سياسية توضح أن الكرملين يفضل الحرب الهجينة لتجنب تفعيل المادة الخامسة للناتو، ويهدف إلى إرهاق أوروبا والتأثير على الرأي العام فيها لتقليص دعم أوكرانيا
سياسة
كالاشنيك: روسيا دمرت أكثر من ألف منشأة مينائية و274 سفينة منذ بدء الغزو الروسي
وزير البنية التحتية يكشف عن انخفاض مناولة البضائع في موانئ أوديسا الكبرى 15 مرة بعد 22 يوليو
سياسة
أوكرانيا يمكن أن تساعد بولندا في مواجهة التخريب الروسي
العالمة السياسية هانا مالكينا تشير إلى أن الخبرة الأوكرانية في مكافحة العمليات التخريبية "لا تقدر بثمن" لدول الناتو
تابعونا عبر فيسبوك
تابعونا عبر تويتر
© Ukraine in Arabic, 2018. All Rights Reserved.